Phonological Constraints on Children’s Use of the Plural
نویسندگان
چکیده
The correct use of an affix, such as the English plural or past tense suffixes, is generally assumed to reflect mastery of the relevant morphological process. An alternate view holds that the use of an affix reflects not only morphological competence, but also additional factors including syntactic, semantic and phonological abilities. The present paper reports on a set of experiments in support of this latter view specifically examining the role of phonology on Englishspeaking children’s ability to produce the plural. Plural productions were elicited from two-year-olds for nouns with different codas, or endings (e.g. dogs vs. keys). The results provide evidence that the production of the plural morpheme –s is partly governed by children’s developing ability to articulate or perceive the phonological form of the plural. This supports a model of language learning in which the acquisition of different components of grammar interact with each other versus a model that is exclusively modular.
منابع مشابه
The Role of Phonology in Children's Acquisition of the Plural.
The correct use of an affix, such as the English plural suffix, may reflect mastery of a morphological process but it may also depend on children's syntactic, semantic and phonological abilities. The present paper reports a set of experiments in support of this latter view, specifically focusing on the importance of the phonological make-up of plural forms for both production and comprehension....
متن کاملInteraction of morphological and phonological markedness in Russian genitive plural allomorphy
This paper incorporates morphological markedness constraints into a framework in which morphology and phonology directly interact, modeled with interleaving of morphological and phonological constraints in serial OT (Wolf 2008, 2009). Morphological markedness constraints are constraints against realization (or spell-out) of morphologically marked feature sets. The empirical data motivating this...
متن کاملRunning head: DUTCH PLURAL INFLECTION Dutch Plural Inflection: The Exception That Proves the Analogy
We develop the view that inflection is driven partly by non-phonological analogy and that non-phonological information is of particular importance to the inflection of non-canonical roots, which in the view of Marcus, Brinkmann, Clahsen, Wiese and Pinker (1995) are inflected by a symbolic rule process. We used the Dutch plural to evaluate these claims. An analysis of corpus data shows that a mo...
متن کاملDutch plural inflection: the exception that proves the analogy.
We develop the view that inflection is driven partly by non-phonological analogy and that non-phonological information is of particular importance to the inflection of non-canonical roots, which in the view of [Marcus, G. F., Brinkmann, U., Clahsen, H., Wiese, R., & Pinker, S. (1995). German inflection: the exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 189-256.] are inflected by a s...
متن کاملError and Expectation in Language Learning: the Curious Absence of Mouses in Adult Speech
As children learn their mother tongues, they make systematic errors. For example, Englishspeaking children regularly say mouses rather than mice. Because children’s errors are not explicitly corrected, it has been argued that children could never learn to make the transition to adult language based on the evidence available to them, and thus that learning even simple aspects of grammar is logic...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008